Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pimlico Tiger's avatar

OK Grace, I know what you think about 'England takes', but here goes.....as is so often the case with football managers, their initial strength is their eventual undoing. For Southgate, his strength has been built on loyalty to his players and in lifting the burden of the England shirt. As you say this, with a meat-and-potatoes tactical set up has been enough for England to be decent in recent tournaments. But now, his loyalty is stopping him making changes (incl subs) and the atmosphere around the squad isn't helping. He and the players seem tetchy and feeling hard done by. The solution: frankly the selection and even the formation don't matter all that much. Almost any permutation of the 26 available is good enough to do well. Rather, they just need to play with more tempo and risk. That's it. I long for Southgate to turn into Claudio Ranieri and stand on the touchline shouting 'play, play, play'

Expand full comment
Adrian Worton's avatar

Happy to see you suggest Saka and TAA as wing backs, that was an idea I've been suggesting too.

The other tactical thing I'd be interested to see is Kane playing alongside Watkins, who stretches the play in a different way. It wouldn't ever happen, but a back five does make a front two a bit easier to accommodate.

For me, I think it's hard to fit Foden, Kane and Bellingham in the same team as they all want to occupy the #10 slot.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts